What paysafecard actually costs you at UK betting sites in 2026

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

Last checked against the Gambling Commission’s public register on 27 October 2026.

The reason a punter Googles “betting sites with paysafecard” is rarely the payment method itself. The 16-digit code is one of the duller products in the cashier — buy a voucher in a shop, type the digits, the balance lands. What the punter is really asking is whether the bookmaker on the other end is one they can hand money to without regretting it later. Paysafecard does not answer that question, and pretending it does is the first mistake a comparison can make. The answer sits on a separate register run by the Gambling Commission, and a deposit method never gets a reader onto that register, off it, or out of trouble with it.

This page works through the cost of paysafecard betting in that order: what the method itself takes from a punter’s wallet, what the bonus machinery does on top, how the cashier actually moves money, where the licensed brands differ, the licence a licensed brand has to hold, the safer-gambling layer that comes with it, and four operators the Commission’s public register shows as licensed to take remote bets from Great Britain today.

What paysafecard does — and what it does not

A paysafecard is a prepaid 16-digit code sold online or in shops and used to pay without a bank account or credit card. The balance of any code can be checked at any time by entering those sixteen digits into the provider’s own balance-check tool — a small, useful habit, because a code spent down to its last penny looks identical to an empty one until the cashier rejects it. The product sits inside a wider group: paysafecard.com Wertkarten GmbH runs the website, and the electronic money for the codes is issued by Prepaid Services Company Limited, which holds authorisation from the Financial Conduct Authority. Paysafecard was founded in 2000 in Vienna; Skrill bought it in 2013, and the group that bought Skrill in 2015 rebranded as Paysafe.

That is the whole product, and it is a thin one by design. There is no card, no account, no statement at the end of the month, no overdraft, and no name on the code unless the punter chooses to register it. For punters who like the discipline of paying with cash, that is the point. For a comparison page, the honest framing is that paysafecard is a deposit method, not a betting licence, not a sign of trustworthiness and not a substitute for either. A bookmaker that takes paysafecard is licensed or unlicensed on exactly the same terms as one that does not.

The cost of paysafecard to the punter is mostly the cost of what it cannot do. It is a one-way street: money goes in, winnings come out by a different method the bookmaker chooses. The same code cannot be refunded to itself, which is the friction punters feel most often when they win. It is also capped per code at modest amounts, so a serious punter stacks several codes for a single deposit. None of this is hidden, and none of it is a reason to avoid the method. It is a reason to know it before depending on it.

The anonymity question, and the answer the law has already given

A paysafecard code is, on its face, anonymous. No bank account touches it, no card is involved, the shopkeeper who sold it has no record of who walked in. The marketing that grows up around that fact — “anonymous betting”, “no-KYC sportsbook”, “paysafecard betting no ID” — treats the code as a passport, and the passport as a route around the rules.

The route closed in Great Britain on 7 May 2019. Since that date every operator holding a Gambling Commission remote licence has to verify a customer’s name, address and date of birth before the first deposit lands, before the first bet is struck, and before a free bet or bonus is credited. A paysafecard deposit at a licensed bookmaker triggers the same verification flow as a debit-card deposit, and the deposit does not move until that flow is finished. The code is anonymous at the shop counter; it stops being anonymous the moment the punter tries to use it to bet with a bookmaker the Commission has licensed.

That is the answer to the “no-KYC paysafecard betting site” search: there are no licensed ones, and there cannot be, because the verification rule is the rule that decides who gets a Commission licence in the first place. Sites that market themselves as “no verification” on a paysafecard deposit are unlicensed for the British market, and the rest of this page is about what that means. Crypto betting sites that take paysafecard are a thinner category still: the licensed side does not advertise a crypto rails-plus-paysafecard product, and a “paysafecard crypto betting site” search returns offshore brands, not Commission-licensed ones. The shortcut the marketing sells is the shortcut the licence forbids.

There is a separate point worth keeping separate. A punter who wants to keep a betting bankroll off a personal current-account statement has a real reason to use paysafecard, and a licensed bookmaker will not stop them. Verification is one step, run once. The bank-statement reason survives the verification, because the deposit still goes through a voucher and not a card. The “anonymous betting” pitch and the bank-statement reason are different products, and the difference is the whole cost of getting this wrong.

What a bonus costs when paysafecard is the deposit

A welcome offer is the part of the page the marketing spends the most money on, and the part the punter spends the most money misunderstanding. The headline — “100% matched free bet up to £25”, “50% back as free bet up to £50”, “10% acca bonus up to £1,000” — describes a token that lands in the punter’s account. What it costs is a different number, in two parts.

The first part is the deposit itself. Betboro’s sports welcome, for instance, is matched free bet up to £25 on the first qualifying wager, and the qualifier is a debit-card deposit of at least £10 followed by a first bet of £5 to £25 with at least three selections each at 3/5 (1.60) or higher. The deposit method named in the terms is the debit card, and that is the rule across the licensed side: the welcome bonus is paid on a deposit the operator can verify, and paysafecard is often a separate route with its own qualifying condition, sometimes with the welcome paid in cash and the free-bet side restricted to debit-card deposits. Where a punter’s only deposit method is paysafecard, the welcome may not be available at all, and the punter discovers this on the cashier page, not on the headline.

The second part is the wagering condition. Since 19 January 2026 a Commission rule has capped wagering requirements on bonuses at ten times the bonus. A £10 bonus at the old 50x was a £500 turnover; the same bonus under the cap is a £100 turnover. Mixed-product promotions — an offer that requires gambling across two or more product types, such as “bet on football to get free spins” — are banned in the same rule. None of that prevents a bookmaker from attaching a low-grade condition the cap allows, and a free bet is a free bet: the stake is usually not paid back with a win, and the value to the punter is the winnings only. Read the small print because the small print is where the cost is.

The acca bonus is the offer the marketing has the easiest time dressing up. Bet Ahoy’s 10% acca bonus up to £1,000 looks like free money on a four-fold; the rule is that one selection lets the punter down and the bonus is gone, and a bookmaker’s margin on a long-odds accumulator is the highest margin on the betting slip. The 10% is a kicker on a structure that already costs more than a single. The “best odds guaranteed” tag on a UK and Irish horse race, in the same offer list, is a different beast — it pays the starting price if the starting price is bigger than the price the punter took, and it costs the bookmaker the gap, not the punter. It is the rare offer that does what the marketing says.

The honest reading of a “free bet” is that the bookmaker has decided, on arithmetic, that the punter’s expected loss through the qualifying conditions is larger than the token’s headline value. Sometimes that arithmetic is generous; often it is not. The cap is the Commission’s response to the worst of it, and the cap is the floor of the conversation, not the ceiling.

The cashier: what paysafecard does at the deposit and withdrawal end

Paysafecard is a deposit-only method at almost every bookmaker that takes it. The punter types the 16-digit code, the balance is checked, the deposit lands. The bookmaker’s published deposit list is the test: a method is “supported” the day the cashier accepts it, and a method the cashier does not accept is not supported whatever the marketing says. DAZN Bet, one of the four licensed brands the Commission’s register shows today, names its own cashier in the help centre: deposits start at £5 by debit card, Apple Pay, paysafecard, Trustly and Skrill, and at £20 by PayPal, with no processing fees. That list is the kind of statement a comparison can lean on, because it is a statement of what the operator accepts, not a statement of what the operator plans to accept.

The withdrawal side is the friction. A paysafecard deposit has to come out by a method the operator supports for withdrawals, and that is rarely paysafecard itself. Skrill and Neteller work; bank transfer works; debit card works for some brands, and the timeline is set by the operator. Kalooki Sportsbook, a brand on the same register, advertises withdrawals by bank transfer within minutes — a strong claim, and one a punter should read as “minutes when the verification is finished”, not as “minutes from the moment the withdraw button is pressed”. Verification is the variable. An unverified account sees the withdrawal stall at the same point the deposit would have stalled, and the speed the marketing brags about belongs to a verified account.

A practical rule for the cashier. Before the first deposit, check the withdrawal page for the method the punter would actually want to use — a bank account in the punter’s own name, typically. The deposit method is a question of habit; the withdrawal method is a question of whether the winnings ever land. The two methods do not have to be the same, and the punter who chooses them as a pair spends less time moving money sideways.

A second rule sits beside it. Since 14 April 2020 credit cards have been banned for gambling in Great Britain, including credit-card-funded payments through an e-wallet, and a paysafecard is unaffected by the ban because it is not a card product. That is the part of the method the marketing rarely explains and the punter rarely asks about, and it is the reason a paysafecard deposit still works where a credit-card deposit would be refused.

The four licensed bookmakers compared

The four operators below are not a ranking and not a recommendation. They are the four brands the plan routes into this comparison, each one shown on the Gambling Commission’s public register against a remote general betting standard (real events) licence, the kind of licence a bookmaker needs to take bets online from customers in Great Britain. The Commission’s register is the test of who holds a licence; it is not a stamp of quality, and the table below is not a list of “the safe four”. A licensed bookmaker is one that has passed the entry test; what a punter does with it after that is the punter’s call.

What the table shows is the licence, the licence holder, and what each operator’s own published terms say about paysafecard or the closest subject. DAZN Bet is the only one of the four that names paysafecard explicitly in its deposit-methods statement, with the £5 minimum, the named co-methods and the absence of processing fees. Betboro’s row is built around the welcome, because the welcome’s qualifying deposit is a debit-card deposit, and that is the cost of choosing paysafecard at Betboro: the headline offer is paid on a different method, and a paysafecard-only punter reads the welcome out of the picture. Bet Ahoy and Star Sports do not publish a paysafecard line, and the table reflects that — neither row asserts nor denies paysafecard support, and a punter who wants to know checks the cashier before the first deposit.

The licence numbers are the working numbers. The format is the Commission’s own — a remote betting licence has a numeric account on the register (48756, 44181, 100094, 9177) and a longer licence number (048756-R-327274-019, 044181-R-324363-007, 100094-R-341742-003, 009177-R-104555-019). The two numbers resolve to the same record. The Commission’s public register can be searched by business name, trading name, domain or account number, and a punter who wants to confirm any of the four entries above types the account number into the register and looks for the licence category “remote general betting standard (real events)”. If the entry is not there, the brand is not licensed to take that kind of bet from Great Britain today.

DAZN Bet — the smallest deposit floor of the four

DAZN Bet sets the deposit floor at £5 across paysafecard, debit card, Apple Pay, Trustly and Skrill, with PayPal the odd one out at £20 and no processing fees on any of them. The £5 minimum is the lowest of the four licensed brands the comparison covers and is the reason a punter who wants to test a bookmaker with a paysafecard code worth ten pounds has somewhere to do it without topping the code up to a higher floor. The licence sits with DZBT Limited under Commission account 48756.

DAZN Bet does not say what its welcome offer looks like or what wagering condition sits on it. A punter who chooses DAZN Bet for the cashier has to read the offer page themselves, and the offer’s qualifying deposit is the first number to check. The £5 floor is a real advantage for a small punter; the offer condition is the part of the comparison a punter has to finish for themselves.

The cost of DAZN Bet is the £5 floor and the absence of processing fees — both stated, both attributable. The withdrawal method is a separate read of the cashier: a paysafecard deposit withdraws to whatever the operator’s withdrawal list says, and that list is the next page the punter opens.

Betboro — the welcome the marketing sells and the deposit method it requires

Betboro’s headline is a 100% matched free bet up to £25 on the first qualifying wager. The qualifier, stated in the operator’s own terms, is a debit-card deposit of £10 or more and a first bet of £5 to £25 across at least three selections each at 1.60 or higher. The licence sits with Webmedia Development N.V. under Commission account 44181.

The cost of the Betboro welcome to a paysafecard punter is the deposit method. The terms name the debit card as the qualifying deposit route; a paysafecard deposit lands in the account but does not trigger the matched free bet, because the matched free bet is paid on the first qualifying wager after a debit-card deposit, and the deposit is what qualifies the wager. A punter who pays in with paysafecard sees a £10 account and no matched free bet on the first bet, and the welcome is read out of the picture. A punter who wants the welcome pays in with a debit card and uses paysafecard on the next deposit, if at all.

The 1.60 minimum price on each leg is a real cost on its own. An accumulator of three legs at 1.60 each is a combined price of about 4.10; a bookmaker’s margin on a 4.10 accumulator is several points higher than the margin on a single at 1.60, and the 10% acca bonus that the marketing likes to attach to long-odds accumulators is a kicker on a structure that already costs the punter more than a single does. The free bet is paid in free-bet tokens, and the stake is not returned with a win — the punter’s profit is the winnings, not the winnings plus the £25 stake.

Bet Ahoy — the racing-heavy offer list

Bet Ahoy’s offer list is built around horse and greyhound racing. The 10% acca bonus up to £1,000 is paid on winning accumulators of a stated size, the Sub-Cover pays out on a player substitution in a named event, the Best Odds Guaranteed pays the starting price if the starting price is bigger than the price the punter took on UK and Irish horse and greyhound racing up to £100 a day, and the Double Result payout settles a UK and Irish racing bet to the result of the first two finishers in the punter’s chosen order. The licence sits with Bet Ahoy Ltd under Commission account 100094.

The cost of a racing-focused offer list to a football-only punter is the obvious one: the Best Odds Guaranteed and the Double Result are racing products, and the 10% acca bonus is a generic accumulator bonus that the operator applies to whatever accumulator the punter builds. A racing punter reads the offer list as a serious product; a football punter reads it as a price-boost shop with one extra feature. The punter pays for the offer in the margin the bookmaker keeps on the markets the offer is attached to, and the offer is paid back only when the conditions land.

The brand is on the licensed side and the cashier accepts what the cashier accepts; the punter who wants to know checks the cashier before the first deposit, and the punter who already has a paysafecard code reads the cashier’s deposit list as the next step.

Star Sports — the safer-gambling product, paid for in the offer

Star Sports’ product is built around the safer-gambling controls. The My Account area carries deposit limits, a Play Break facility and self-exclusion, and the app is published for the UK and Ireland. The licence sits with Star Racing Limited under Commission account 9177. Star Sports is a smaller brand on the licensed register, and the offer list a punter will find is the offer list a smaller licensed brand carries — fewer acca bonuses, fewer boosted-odds headlines, and a sharper safer-gambling layer.

The cost of a smaller brand is the market depth. A bigger licensed bookmaker’s price-boost list runs into the hundreds on a Saturday; a smaller bookmaker’s runs into the dozens, and the prices the punter can take are the prices the smaller bookmaker is willing to lay. The trade is a quieter product for a punter who wants a quieter product, and a smaller market for a punter who wants the depth. The register does not rank; the punter does.

What a Gambling Commission licence is, and what it is not

The Gambling Commission is a non-departmental public body that licenses the commercial gambling market in Great Britain under the Gambling Act 2005. The Act covers England, Scotland and Wales; Northern Ireland sits outside it under its own older law, and a Commission licence is not a Northern Irish licence. Since the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014 an operator whose remote facilities are used in Great Britain has to hold a Commission licence wherever it is based — a Curaçao, Maltese or Gibraltar licence does not substitute, and an operator licensed in any of those places and serving British customers without a Commission licence is committing an offence under section 33 of the 2005 Act.

The licence types that matter for an online sportsbook are the remote general betting standard licences — the real-events licence and the virtual-events licence — plus the remote pool betting licence and the remote betting intermediary licence for exchanges. The four operators in this comparison all hold the real-events licence, and the Commission’s public register is searchable by business name, trading name, domain or account number. A registered entry with the right category is the test of a licence; an absence from the register is the test of an unlicensed operator.

What the licence is not is a quality mark. The Commission’s entry test covers the operator’s fitness, finances and systems; it does not cover the operator’s prices, the depth of the markets, the speed of the withdrawals, the generosity of the offers or the quality of the customer service. Two licensed bookmakers can hold the same licence category and run very different products, and a licensed bookmaker is a bookmaker the Commission has allowed to operate, not a bookmaker the Commission has endorsed.

The financial-spread-betting carve-out is worth a line. Financial spread betting is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, not the Commission; Spreadex, for example, holds an FCA authorisation for spread betting and a Commission licence for fixed-odds betting, and the two regimes are different products on the same trading name. The licensed sportsbook comparison is a Commission-licence comparison; a financial-spread-betting product is an FCA-regulated product on top.

What the licensed side does to the punter

A Commission licence is a permission to operate, and the conditions attached to it are the part the punter feels. The headline conditions, in the order a punter meets them, run like this.

Identity is verified before the first deposit or bet, including with a free bet or bonus, and the verification covers name, address and date of birth. The code in a paysafecard is anonymous at the shop counter; it stops being anonymous at the licensed bookmaker’s cashier. The punter’s account is opened on verified details, and the same details attach to every subsequent deposit, including paysafecard.

A financial vulnerability check applies once the punter’s deposits minus withdrawals pass £150 in a rolling 30 days (in force since 28 February 2025). The check is a public-record check — bankruptcy registers, county court judgments — not an income check, not a credit-reference check, and not the “affordability check” the press has spent two years writing about. Financial risk assessments of the kind the press means are in a staged plan the Commission published on 7 July 2026, with no start date, and the licensed side is not running them yet.

GAMSTOP is the national multi-operator self-exclusion scheme, mandatory for online operators since 31 March 2020, with periods of six months, one year, five years, or five years with auto-renewal, and a seven-year tail after the minimum period. A punter who has self-excluded cannot open an account at any licensed online bookmaker until the exclusion is lifted, and paysafecard is no way round it.

Deposit limits are the punter’s choice and the operator’s obligation. The first phase of a Commission rule on gross deposit limits on a fixed time frame has applied since 31 October 2025, a second phase was postponed to 30 September 2026, and whether the second phase is live today is not established. The punter’s right to set a personal deposit limit, on a daily, weekly or monthly basis, has been there for years; the rule refines what the operator has to offer.

Bonuses carry a wagering cap of 10x since 19 January 2026, and mixed-product promotions are banned. A £10 bonus at 50x was a £500 turnover; the same bonus under the cap is a £100 turnover. The cap is the floor of a conversation the marketing would rather not have.

Credit cards have been banned for gambling in Great Britain since 14 April 2020, including credit-card-funded payments through an e-wallet; a paysafecard deposit is unaffected. The ban explains why every cashier a punter opens in this market lists a debit card, a bank transfer, an e-wallet or paysafecard, and never a credit card.

The punter pays no tax on betting winnings. General Betting Duty is the operator’s tax, currently 15% on gross profits, with a new remote betting rate of 25% from 1 April 2027 within the existing structure. Whether the operator passes duty on through prices is not established, and the punter’s take-home is the return on the bet. A professional gambler asks HMRC or an adviser; the rest of the market does not.

What the unlicensed side costs

An unlicensed brand marketing paysafecard betting to British customers is operating against section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005, aimed at the operator. A punter who simply bets on an unlicensed site commits no offence under the law, and the honest framing is not ‘illegal to use’. The honest framing is what the punter gives up.

No GAMSTOP coverage. A punter who has self-excluded can still open an account at an unlicensed bookmaker, and the self-exclusion stops being a self-exclusion the moment the punter walks through a door the scheme does not cover.

No Commission complaints route. The Commission’s approved dispute-resolution route is the route a punter uses when a licensed bookmaker withholds funds, and the route ends at IBAS or the Commission’s own adjudication. An unlicensed bookmaker offers no equivalent route, and a punter with a complaint has the small-claims track and the jurisdiction the operator is based in.

No British consumer protection. Funds held by a Curaçao-licensed operator are held under Curaçao law, and a punter who wants them back goes to a Curaçao court. The Commission’s protection of segregated customer funds does not extend to the unlicensed side.

No 10x bonus cap. A punter who takes a bonus at an unlicensed brand takes the bonus on the terms the brand publishes, and the brand is not bound by the cap the Commission set in January 2026. The bonus may be worse; the cap does not apply.

No £150 vulnerability check. A punter who is in difficulty at an unlicensed brand has no Commission-mandated check to lean on. The brand’s own responsible-gambling page is the only page there is.

No protection of identity. An unlicensed brand does not run a Commission-mandated verification flow, and the paysafecard pitch is exactly that pitch — anonymity at the cashier. The punter’s data sits in the operator’s database, and the operator’s database is held to no standard the punter can enforce.

The Commission’s enforcement is disruption, not blocking: cease-and-desist notices, search-engine referrals, work with registrars, hosts and payment providers, and court-order DNS blocking powers that have been granted or are about to be. None of that returns a lost stake. The honest framing of an unlicensed brand is not that it is the unsafe choice; it is that it is the unregulated choice, and the punter wears the cost of the regulation that is missing.

Safer gambling, paid for in the offer the licensed side attaches to it

The safer-gambling layer is the part of the licensed product the marketing tries hardest to render invisible. It is also the part the punter is most likely to need, and the part a comparison should make easy to find.

The licensed bookmaker’s My Account area carries the controls. Deposit limits, session limits, time-outs and self-exclusion are the four standard tools; a Play Break facility, a player-profile test and product restrictions are extras some brands add. The four operators in this comparison are the four the register shows as licensed today, and the safer-gambling layer is the part of each brand a punter reads first. Star Sports’ My Account carries deposit limits, a Play Break facility and self-exclusion; Unibet adds deposit limits, a player-profile test, product restrictions and self-exclusion with live-chat support and links to BeGambleAware, GamCare, GAMSTOP, Gambling Therapy and the BGC. Midnite, similarly outside the routed set, links to GambleAware, GamCare, GAMSTOP and BetBlocker; Betmaster to GambleAware, GAMSTOP, BetBlocker and GamCare; Fitzwilliam Sports to GambleAware, GAMSTOP and Gamblers Anonymous. The pattern is the same: every licensed brand carries a safer-gambling page, and the help the page links to is the same help across the licensed side.

The help that is not on the brand’s own page sits with the same names. GamCare runs the National Gambling Helpline; GambleAware funds treatment and research; the NHS runs gambling clinics; Gamblers Anonymous runs peer support. The punter who needs help does not need a brand recommendation, and the punter who is helping someone else does not need a brand to mediate.

The cost of the safer-gambling layer is the offer the licensed side attaches to it. The 10x bonus cap, the £150 vulnerability check, the GAMSTOP coverage and the verification before the first deposit are the price the licensed side pays for the licence, and the price the punter pays for the product. The unlicensed side does not pay it, and the punter on the unlicensed side does not get the product.

Where the cost actually lands

A punter who has chosen paysafecard as a deposit method and a licensed bookmaker as the operator has done two things at once. The paysafecard choice has put a cap on the deposit method, cut the bank-statement trail and locked the withdrawal to a different route. The licence choice has put the operator on the Commission’s register, attached the safer-gambling layer and capped the welcome offer at 10x turnover. The two choices do not always pull in the same direction, and the part of the comparison the punter does for themselves is the part where they do not.

A £5 deposit at DAZN Bet through paysafecard is the lowest-friction test of a licensed bookmaker in this comparison. The £5 lands, the verification runs once, the withdrawal method is chosen at the cashier, and the punter has a licensed account that accepts the method the punter wanted to use. The welcome offer at DAZN Bet is the part the punter reads on the operator’s own page.

A paysafecard deposit at Betboro lands the deposit but does not trigger the matched free bet, because the matched free bet is paid on a debit-card deposit. The punter who wants the welcome pays in with a debit card and uses paysafecard on the next deposit. The punter who does not want the welcome skips the welcome and uses paysafecard from the first deposit, and the licensed bookmaker does not penalise them for it.

A punter at Bet Ahoy pays in with the method the cashier accepts, and the racing-heavy offer list is the part of the operator the punter reads first. A punter at Star Sports pays for the quieter brand in the offer list the bigger brands do not run, and the safer-gambling layer is the part of the brand the punter reads first. The cost of each operator is the trade the punter is willing to make, and the comparison is the trade laid out so the punter can make it with their eyes open.

The page does not pick the operator for the punter. The four operators in this comparison are four brands the Commission’s register shows as licensed to take real-events bets from Great Britain today, and the rest is the punter’s call.

Frequently asked questions

Is betting with paysafecard legal in Great Britain?

Paysafecard is a regulated payment method, and betting with it is legal at a Gambling Commission-licensed bookmaker, subject to the same age and identity checks that apply to every other deposit method. A paysafecard code is not, on its own, a route around the verification every licensed bookmaker runs before the first deposit or bet.

Can I lose money betting with paysafecard?

Yes. Paysafecard is a deposit method, not a betting method, and the punter’s stake, the odds, the bookmaker’s margin and the outcome of the event are unchanged by the deposit route. A losing bet with a paysafecard deposit loses the same way a losing bet with a debit-card deposit does, and the deposit method does not insulate the punter from a bookmaker’s margin.

Can paysafecard be used in a betting shop?

Paysafecard is an online product; the code is bought in a shop and redeemed online. The licensed betting shop runs its own payment terminals and its own self-exclusion scheme, which is a separate service from GAMSTOP, and a paysafecard code is not the route into a betting-shop bet.

What payment methods do GB-licensed bookmakers take, and are credit cards allowed?

The cashier is set by the operator, and the licensed brands on this page take a mix of debit card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, paysafecard, Trustly, Skrill, Pay by Bank (Open Banking) and Revolut Pay, with the exact list on each operator’s help pages. Credit cards have been banned for gambling in Great Britain since 14 April 2020, including credit-card-funded payments through an e-wallet, and a credit-card deposit is refused at the licensed cashier.

From what age can bets be placed in Great Britain, and when is identity verified?

The minimum age for betting in Great Britain is 18, and a licensed bookmaker has to verify the punter’s name, address and date of birth before the first deposit, the first bet, or the credit of any free bet or bonus. The verification runs once, on the licensed operator’s own page, and paysafecard is not a route around it.

How can it be checked that a bookmaker holds a Gambling Commission licence?

The Commission’s public register is searchable by business name, trading name, domain or account number, and a registered entry with the licence category “remote general betting standard (real events)” is the test of a licence for an online sportsbook. A punter who wants to confirm any brand types the account number or the trading name into the register and reads the entry. The register is the test, and an unlicensed brand is an unlicensed brand because the register does not list it.

Content created by the «Bookies Trust» team