Best Bitcoin Betting Sites in the UK for 2026: Licensed Bookmakers, Honest Trade-Offs

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

The honest lead on this subject starts with a fact that none of the marketing around it acknowledges: in Great Britain, every bookmaker that takes a remote bet from a customer in England, Scotland or Wales needs a Gambling Commission licence, regardless of where the company is based or which currency the punter uses to fund the account. The Commission’s public register is the whole test of who holds one. There is no British rule for or against cryptocurrency deposits at a licensed operator, so the only honest answer to “which bookmaker accepts Bitcoin” is the one each operator’s own terms publish — and where those terms name no crypto method, the page says only what they do list. Identity checks before the first deposit apply at every licensed site. A crypto sportsbook without a Gambling Commission licence offers no GAMSTOP, no Commission complaints route and no approved dispute-resolution body; such brands are not reviewed here.

Data current as of 27 October 2026, verified against the Gambling Commission’s public register for remote betting licences in Great Britain.

What “betting with bitcoin” actually means at a UK bookmaker

Bitcoin is a digital currency, native to the internet, that has been in continuous operation since its genesis block on 3 January 2009, when its pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto mined the first 50 BTC. Nakamoto had published the Bitcoin white paper on 31 October 2008, and the identity behind that name has never been verified. The network validates transactions through a proof-of-work consensus mechanism based on SHA-256 hashing, with a new block created roughly every ten minutes on average. The protocol schedules the total supply at 21 million coins, with full issuance expected around the year 2140; the mining reward halves every 210,000 blocks in a mechanism called halving, and it began at 50 BTC per block.

Three things follow for a bettor thinking about Bitcoin as a deposit method. The asset itself is technically sound and old enough to be ordinary infrastructure. Its on-chain ledger is public, which means every transaction is traceable — the word often used in this market is “pseudonymous”, and the right gloss is “traceable from address to address, not anonymous from the world”. And in Great Britain, the question “is Bitcoin accepted here?” is settled not by the network but by the bookmaker’s banking page.

The landscape at a licensed UK bookmaker

A bookmaker that holds a Gambling Commission remote licence may publish a banking page that lists debit cards, bank transfer, Apple Pay, PayPal, e-wallets and prepaid vouchers, and stop there. Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT and other cryptoassets are typically absent from the standard cashier at the long-established brands. The Commission’s own guidance classes cryptoassets, including Bitcoin, as a high-risk payment method and expects licensed gambling operators to treat crypto-funded play as a high-risk indicator requiring enhanced customer due diligence. That is the regulatory stance, not a prohibition: it sets the bar for what an operator must do when it does accept crypto, not whether it must.

What this means in practice: a licensed UK bookmaker that does accept Bitcoin will ask for the same identity documents as any other, may ask where the funds came from when the spend crosses a threshold, and runs the deposit through the same safer-gambling controls — GAMSTOP self-exclusion, deposit limits, financial vulnerability checks — as any other payment method. The crypto part is the funding rail, not a workaround around the licence.

What a bettor gains and loses by using bitcoin

The upside that is real, and that licensed operators do not advertise: deposits in Bitcoin settle on a public ledger that the punter can verify independently, with no payment processor in the middle. For someone who already holds BTC and thinks of it as money, sending it to a bookmaker is operationally the same as sending it to any other merchant. The settlement time is governed by the network’s block rhythm, not by a bank.

The upside that is mostly marketing: anonymity. There is no anonymous play at a licensed UK bookmaker. The licence condition since 7 May 2019 has been that name, address and date of birth are verified before a customer can deposit or gamble — including with a free bet or bonus. Using Bitcoin instead of a debit card changes the funding rail; it does not remove the verification step. For someone who wants to bet without an account at all, the only path is an unlicensed site, which trades one kind of friction for a different and more expensive one, as the section on offshore brands makes plain.

The cost that is real: the same spread Betting Association market reality that applies to every other deposit. The bookmaker’s margin sits inside every price, and Bitcoin does not change it. When the BTC settles against pounds at the moment of deposit and again at withdrawal, the punter also takes the FX move on both sides — a real cost on a short hold, a smaller one on a longer one.

The legal frame around crypto betting in Great Britain

Britain regulates the gambling side, not the currency side. The two regimes meet at the cashier, and a clear picture of each is worth the space.

How a bookmaker gets the right to take a GB bet

The Commission is a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. It licenses operators under the Gambling Act 2005, which covers Great Britain; Northern Ireland is outside the Act and runs its own older law. Since the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014 an operator whose remote facilities are used in Great Britain needs a Commission licence wherever it is based — sections 33 and 36 of the 2005 Act as amended. A Curaçao, Maltese or Gibraltar licence is not a substitute. There is no state monopoly and no cap on the number of licences.

The licence types matter because they tell a punter what kind of betting a brand is permitted to offer: remote general betting standard (real events), remote general betting standard (virtual events), remote general betting limited, remote pool betting and remote betting intermediary (the licence for betting exchanges). All seven brands in this comparison hold the real-events general betting standard. The Commission’s public register can be searched by business name, trading name, domain or account number and is the whole test of whether a brand holds a licence.

What the regulator says about crypto specifically

The Commission’s published position on digital and virtual currencies is that licensed gambling operators should treat crypto-funded play as a high-risk indicator requiring enhanced customer due diligence. The language is supervisory; it sets what an operator must do when it does accept crypto, not a duty to refuse it. There is no Commission rule naming which cryptoassets are or are not acceptable at the cashier, and no published list of GB-licensed brands that accept Bitcoin. The honest reading: the regulator treats crypto as a higher-risk funding rail, and the operators that take it have to work harder on the customer-side checks, which is why the long-established high-street names typically do not.

The Financial Conduct Authority sits on the other side of the counter. Since 10 January 2020 the FCA has been the anti-money-laundering supervisor of UK cryptoasset businesses, including Bitcoin exchanges, under Regulation 8L and Regulation 9 of the Money Laundering Regulations. Cryptoasset exchange providers and custodian wallet providers operating in the UK must register with the FCA under the Money Laundering Regulations before starting business. The Commission’s figures since supervision began in January 2020 tell the state of the register: 417 cryptoasset registration applications received, of which 68 (17% of determined applications) have been registered and 263 (67%) withdrawn. A high withdrawal rate is not a finding of wrongdoing — it is a finding that many applicants could not meet the bar.

The practical upshot: a punter funding a licensed UK bookmaker with Bitcoin is dealing with two regulated businesses at once, the bookmaker through the Commission and the exchange through the FCA, and the protection runs through both registers. Using an unregistered one is not a criminal offence for the punter, but it is the place where the traceable-public-ledger argument collapses.

Tax, KYC and the rules no operator can waive

The player pays no tax on betting winnings in Great Britain — that is the general rule. General Betting Duty is the operator’s tax on gross profits, currently 15%; from 1 April 2027 a new remote betting rate of 25% applies within it, while remote bets on UK horse racing, bets on self-service betting terminals in licensed premises, pool betting and in-person betting stay at 15%. Whether operators pass duty on through odds is not established, and it should never be written that the player is charged duty. Spread betting that is not a financial product sits inside General Betting Duty; financial spread betting is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and is its own regime.

Bitcoin held by an individual is not tax-free, and the two taxes are independent. HMRC treats cryptoassets such as Bitcoin held by individuals as subject to Capital Gains Tax on disposal — selling, swapping, spending or gifting them. The same applies when Bitcoin is used to fund a betting account: the disposal into the bookmaker is a taxable event in its own right, separate from any gambling result. HMRC also applies Income Tax and National Insurance to cryptoassets received as non-cash employment income or as mining and staking rewards. None of this is specific to gambling; it is the general UK tax treatment of cryptoassets. Anyone whose BTC activity is more than occasional should ask HMRC or a tax adviser for a ruling on their own position.

Credit cards, e-wallets and what is actually allowed

Credit cards have been banned for gambling in Great Britain since 14 April 2020 under LCCP condition 6.1.2, and the ban extends to credit-card-funded payments through an e-wallet. Debit cards and bank-based payments are not covered. The ban sits on the merchant, not the punter, and a cashier that refuses credit cards is doing what the licence requires. This is one rule the marketing copy around “anonymous crypto betting” cannot get around — the licensed path runs through a debit card, a bank transfer or a properly verified e-wallet, with crypto as an additional rail where the operator publishes it.

Identity verification before the first deposit means no anonymous play at a licensed site. Source-of-funds questions at higher spend are normal under the money-laundering rules. A British named-account rule, a state list of permitted payment methods and any rule for or against cryptocurrency deposits at licensed operators are not established: payments are described here only from each operator’s terms.

Responsible gambling

The licence is also a package of player-protection rules, and several of them apply no matter how the account is funded.

GAMSTOP is the national multi-operator online self-exclusion scheme and a mandatory licence condition for online operators since 31 March 2020. Self-exclusion periods are six months, one year, five years, or five years with auto-renewal. After the minimum period the exclusion stays in place for a further seven years unless the customer asks GAMSTOP to remove it. GAMSTOP covers online sites and apps; betting shops use a separate service. Every GB-licensed online operator takes part.

A financial vulnerability check under LCCP condition 3.4.4, in force since 30 August 2024, applies to licensed remote betting when a customer’s deposits minus withdrawals exceed £150 in a rolling 30 days — that threshold has applied since 28 February 2025. The check is a public-record check (bankruptcy or county court judgments, for example), not an income check and not a credit reference check. Financial risk assessments — the affordability checks of the press — are announced in a staged plan, with no start date; the published line is “announced, staged, no start date”, and that is how it stands.

Deposit limits under RTS 12 require operators to offer a gross deposit limit on a fixed time frame; the first changes have applied since 31 October 2025, and a second phase was postponed to 30 September 2026, with the live status not established. There is no state-set deposit or loss ceiling for betting: limits are the customer’s choice. Help is available through GamCare (which runs the National Gambling Helpline), GambleAware, NHS gambling clinics and Gamblers Anonymous.

Bonus rules that apply at every licensed site

Since 19 January 2026, wagering requirements on bonuses are capped at 10x — a £10 bonus at 50x would have needed £500 of bets, and under the cap no more than £100. Mixed-product promotions are banned: an offer that requires gambling on two or more product types such as betting, casino, bingo and lottery — “bet on football to get free spins”, to take the textbook example — is no longer permitted. Whether the cap applies to free bets with no wagering condition, and any cap on the money value of a bonus, are not established. “Risk-free” in marketing copy usually means a free bet whose stake is not paid back on a win, not a money refund — the distinction is worth reading in the small print.

What a bettor loses at an unlicensed site

The honest framing is symmetrical. Licensed = identity verification, deposit limits, GAMSTOP, the 10x bonus cap, ADR, an approved dispute-resolution body and the Commission’s complaints route; the cost is friction at signup and source-of-funds questions at higher spend. Unlicensed = none of those protections, no British consumer redress if funds are withheld, not bound by the 10x bonus cap or the £150 vulnerability check, and the strong possibility that a winning account is simply not paid out.

Enforcement against unlicensed brands is disruption, not blocking: cease-and-desist notices, search-engine referrals, work with registrars, hosts and payment providers. The Commission has been given, or is about to receive, court-order DNS blocking powers, but ISP blocking is not in operation. Providing gambling facilities in Great Britain without the licence the Act requires is an offence under section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005 — on summary conviction up to 51 weeks’ imprisonment, a fine up to level 5, or both; six months in Scotland. The offence is aimed at the operator. No offence aimed at a customer who merely bets on an unlicensed site was found in the published guidance; the loss is one of protection, not of liberty, and it should be described that way.

The crypto side: blockchain, ledger, pseudonymity

The technical picture is worth a paragraph because most of what is sold as “anonymous Bitcoin betting” depends on a misreading of it.

A Bitcoin transaction is a signed message on a public ledger. The address is a string of letters and digits; the message is permanent; anyone can read it. The address is not a name, but it is also not nothing — chain analysis firms do precisely this work for regulated businesses, and the Commission’s position on crypto as a high-risk payment method exists because that analysis is good enough to be useful. Pseudonymous is the right word. Anonymous is the wrong one.

The implication for a licensed UK bookmaker is operational. The cashier at a brand that does accept Bitcoin is doing two things at once: receiving a payment and verifying the punter. The two checks are independent — knowing who sent the BTC does not satisfy the Commission’s identity rules, and vice versa. The high-risk-indicator language is the regulator telling operators to do both well. A crypto cashier that only checks the wallet and skips the photo ID is not a loophole, it is an unsafe brand that has not read its own licence.

The implication for the punter is also operational. Funding an account with Bitcoin does not move the account outside the safer-gambling controls. GAMSTOP self-exclusion applies whatever rail the deposit uses; the £150 rolling-30-day vulnerability check applies to deposits minus withdrawals whatever the rail; the 10x bonus cap applies whatever the rail. The funding method is not a get-out for any of those.

What bitcoin changes at the cashier, in one line

The deposit rail. The price, the market, the margin, the bonus terms and the safer-gambling controls are the same as for a debit card. The cashier is the only place Bitcoin shows up in the punter’s experience of a licensed UK bookmaker, and at most of the long-established high-street names it does not show up there at all.

What we compared the seven licensed brands on

This comparison is short — seven brands, all GB-licensed, all holding a remote general betting standard licence for real events — because the licence is the load-bearing test. No brand in this comparison is “the only” licensed one; the Commission’s register lists far more. What follows is not a ranking of who is best at crypto, because none of the seven publishes Bitcoin in its standard cashier. It is a comparison of which bookmaker suits which kind of punter, with the crypto question answered honestly for each: which operator’s terms name crypto, which say nothing about it, and which run on a rail a punter considering Bitcoin should look at first.

The comparison uses four columns: the brand and its Commission account number, the licence holder named on the register, and what the operator’s own published terms say about Bitcoin or crypto at the cashier. The same information sits in the write-ups below in more depth.

The picture that falls out of the table is the headline finding of the comparison: every one of the seven brands accepts pounds through conventional rails, and none publishes Bitcoin at the standard cashier. For a punter whose first question is “which UK bookmaker takes Bitcoin?”, the honest answer from these seven is “not the cashier you would hope for”. The brands that do take BTC at the cashier are typically Curaçao-licensed, run outside the British regime, and offer none of the protections this page has just listed.

A second reading of the table: a punter who already holds BTC and wants to use it does not need a Bitcoin cashier to fund a UK-licensed account. Selling BTC for pounds through a registered FCA-supervised exchange, withdrawing to a UK bank account and depositing at the bookmaker is operationally a few extra steps and produces the same outcome. The trade-off is that the exchange registers a disposal for Capital Gains Tax purposes — a real cost, not a marketing line — and the bank transfer takes longer than a same-block Bitcoin settlement.

QuinnBet

QuinnBet holds Gambling Commission remote licence 061011-R-335683-004 under Commission account 61011, for remote general betting (standard, real events), with QuinnBet (Gibraltar) Limited as the licence holder. QuinnBet’s free bets are valid for seven days from credit and can be used on any market at odds of 1/2 (1.50) or greater, with maximum odds of 50/1; straight accumulators are allowed but Trixies, Patents and Yankees are not. The cashier publishes the usual UK rails and does not name Bitcoin or any other cryptoasset. QuinnBet is a useful bookmaker for a punter who wants a sportsbook with a clear, plainly stated free-bet regime and is comfortable funding the account in pounds — and a poor fit for the punter whose first filter is a crypto cashier.

Spreadex

Spreadex holds Gambling Commission remote licence 008835-R-104580-022 under Commission account 8835, covering remote general betting (standard, real events), with Spreadex Limited as the licence holder. Spreadex is regulated by the FCA for spread betting and by the Gambling Commission for fixed-odds betting, and its own homepage states that spread betting losses can exceed the deposit. The combination of FCA and Commission oversight is unusual and matters to anyone who treats Spreadex as a financial product as well as a sportsbook. The cashier runs on conventional UK rails; Bitcoin is not named. Spreadex suits a punter who wants a single account for sports spread betting and fixed-odds betting, and who reads the spread-bet risk warning before placing the first trade.

Geoff Banks

Geoff Banks holds Gambling Commission remote licence 054095-R-330366-010 under Commission account 54095, licensed for remote general betting (standard, real events), with GB Sports Advisors Limited as the licence holder. The Geoff Banks app is published by GB Sports Advisors Ltd and offers live in-play prices and ante-post prices on future events. The cashier publishes the standard UK rails; Bitcoin is not named. The brand suits a punter who wants a smaller, app-led sportsbook with a named-operator feel, and a poor fit for a punter expecting a crypto cashier.

DAZN Bet

DAZN Bet holds Gambling Commission remote licence 048756-R-327274-019 under Commission account 48756, on a remote general betting (standard, real events) licence, with DZBT Limited as the licence holder. DAZN Bet’s deposits start at £5 by debit card, Apple Pay, Paysafecard, Trustly and Skrill, and at £20 by PayPal, with no processing fees. The cashier lists six payment methods, none of them crypto. DAZN Bet suits a punter who wants a low minimum deposit and a long menu of payment methods — including two e-wallets that are usually blocked at competitors — and a poor fit for the punter who filters on Bitcoin.

Fitzdares

Fitzdares holds Gambling Commission remote licence 000400-R-103839-030 under Commission account 400, in the remote general betting standard (real events) category, with Fitzdares Limited as the licence holder. Fitzdares accepts Apple Pay, Mastercard and Visa; Visa withdrawals are usually same-day, while Mastercard withdrawals can take up to 48 hours. The cashier is short on crypto for the same reason every other brand here is short on crypto. Fitzdares suits a punter who values fast Visa withdrawals and is happy funding the account through conventional cards; it is the wrong place for a punter who wants to fund with Bitcoin.

LiveScore Bet

LiveScore Bet holds Gambling Commission remote licence 056859-R-332720-005 under Commission account 56859, in the remote general betting standard (real events) category, with LiveScore Betting and Gaming (Gibraltar) Limited as the licence holder. LiveScore Bet accepts debit cards (Visa and Mastercard), Apple Pay, PayPal, Pay by Bank (Open Banking) and Revolut Pay. The cashier is the broadest in this comparison in number of rails, and still does not include Bitcoin. LiveScore Bet suits a punter who wants Open Banking and Revolut Pay alongside the usual cards and e-wallets, and a poor fit for a punter who wants a crypto cashier.

Kwiff

Kwiff holds Gambling Commission remote licence 044448-R-323408-017 under Commission account 44448, in the remote general betting standard (real events) category, with Eaton Gate Gaming Limited as the licence holder. The kwiff app has a 17+ age rating in the UK App Store and is described by the brand as a trademark operated by Spryme Ltd. The cashier publishes standard UK rails; Bitcoin is not named. Kwiff suits a punter who likes the surprise-price mechanic it advertises, and a poor fit for a punter whose first question is whether the cashier takes Bitcoin.

The honest reading for a punter choosing between these seven

The seven brands in this comparison share four things in common. Each holds a Commission remote licence for real-event betting. Each runs the same safer-gambling controls. Each publishes a cashier that lists pounds and conventional rails. None of them publishes Bitcoin at the standard cashier. The choice between them is not about which one accepts BTC; it is about which one’s product mix, payment menu and free-bet rules suit the way the punter actually bets.

For a punter who wants the broadest cashier, LiveScore Bet (debit cards, Apple Pay, PayPal, Open Banking, Revolut Pay) and DAZN Bet (debit cards, Apple Pay, Paysafecard, Trustly, Skrill, PayPal from £20) publish the longest lists. For a punter who values fast withdrawals, Fitzdares’ same-day Visa window is the strongest on the page. For a punter who wants a clearly stated free-bet regime, QuinnBet’s seven-day window and the explicit 1/2 minimum odds are the most plainly written. For a punter who wants a sportsbook and a spread betting account under one roof, Spreadex is the only one with FCA supervision on the spread side. Geoff Banks and Kwiff suit a punter who prefers a smaller, app-led product over a high-street brand.

For a punter whose first filter is Bitcoin at the cashier, none of these seven is the answer. The trade-off the page has been building toward is this: the licensed UK market on this evidence does not publish Bitcoin at the standard cashier, and the brands that do publish it are running outside the British regime. Choosing a Bitcoin cashier means choosing fewer protections, a slower dispute route and a real chance of funds being withheld. The honest answer to “best Bitcoin betting sites in the UK” is not that the best site takes BTC; it is that the best UK-licensed site is a poor place to use BTC, and the brands that welcome BTC are not the best UK-licensed sites.

How to check a bookmaker’s licence yourself

The Commission’s public register is searchable by business name, trading name, domain or account number. It is the whole test of whether a brand holds a licence for Great Britain; nothing else is. To check a brand, search for the trading name (the one shown on the website’s footer or terms page) and confirm three things: that an entry exists, that the licence category includes remote general betting standard (real events) if the brand offers sports, and that the licence holder’s name matches the small print on the brand’s own terms page. If any of those three does not line up, the licence is not what the brand says it is.

The Commission’s register also shows whether a brand is connected to others under the same licence holder — Ladbrokes and Coral sit under Entain, Paddy Power and Betfair sit under Flutter, and several brands can share one licence. That is normal and is not in itself a red flag. A red flag is a brand whose domain does not appear on the register at all, or appears against a different licence holder than the one its terms name.

For a punter checking a Bitcoin-accepting brand, the same exercise applies with one extra step: confirm the exchange or wallet provider that holds the BTC is registered with the FCA under the Money Laundering Regulations, since 10 January 2020. The FCA’s register is searchable and lists cryptoasset businesses that have passed the registration bar.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can you bet against bitcoin?

Betting “against” Bitcoin can mean two different things. The first is betting on a bookmaker’s sports markets while funding the account with BTC, which is what most of this page has covered. The second is betting on the price of Bitcoin itself — a financial product, not a sports bet — which is governed by the FCA and offered through spread betting firms and exchanges, not through a Gambling Commission sportsbook. Spreadex, for example, is supervised by the FCA for spread betting and by the Commission for fixed-odds sports betting, and the two regimes sit on different parts of the site. A punter who wants price exposure to BTC should treat that as a financial decision with its own risk warnings, not a sports bet.

Can you lose on bitcoin betting?

Yes, and in three ways at once. The first is the bet itself — a sports wager is a position on an outcome, and the bookmaker’s margin sits inside every price. The second is the movement of BTC against GBP between deposit and withdrawal: if the punter deposits £200 worth of BTC and the price falls 10% before withdrawal, the punter has taken a £20 FX loss on top of any sports result. The third is the tax treatment — selling or spending BTC is a disposal for Capital Gains Tax purposes, separate from any gambling outcome. None of these are reasons not to bet; they are the full cost of the position, and the punter should know them before placing the first bet.

Can you use bitcoin in betting shops?

Betting shops in Great Britain operate under separate Commission rules and use a different self-exclusion scheme from GAMSTOP. Bitcoin is not a standard payment method at UK bookmakers’ high-street counters, where the rails are cash and debit card. A punter who wants to use BTC in person would need a wallet that converts at the counter, and no UK betting shop the Commission’s register covers publishes such a facility. The short answer for the question as asked is no.

What does a player lose by betting on a site without a Gambling Commission licence?

The four practical protections. No GAMSTOP coverage, so a self-exclusion does not apply. No Commission complaints route, so a dispute that the operator’s own support will not resolve has no British regulator to escalate to. No approved dispute-resolution body, so the punter cannot take the case to an ADR provider the Commission has approved. And no British consumer redress if funds are withheld — the punter’s recourse is a foreign court under a foreign contract. The cost is real money in the cases that go wrong, and the safer-gambling controls do not apply either. There is no published offence aimed at a customer who bets on an unlicensed site, but the loss of protection is the loss.

How can it be checked that a bookmaker holds a Gambling Commission licence?

The Commission’s public register is searchable by business name, trading name, domain or account number. Search for the trading name shown on the brand’s homepage, confirm an entry exists, and check three things: that the licence category includes remote general betting standard (real events) for a sports brand, that the licence holder’s name matches the small print on the brand’s own terms page, and that the account number matches what the brand publishes. If any of the three does not line up, the brand is not what it claims to be. For a punter funding the account with Bitcoin, the same exercise should be repeated on the FCA’s register to confirm the cryptoasset business holding the BTC is registered under the Money Laundering Regulations.

Which payment methods do GB-licensed bookmakers accept, and are credit cards allowed?

There is no Commission list of permitted payment methods; each operator publishes its own cashier. The pattern across the seven brands in this comparison is debit cards (Visa and Mastercard), bank transfer and a menu of e-wallets — Apple Pay, PayPal, Trustly, Skrill, Paysafecard, Revolut Pay and Open Banking in various combinations — with minimum deposits typically £5. Credit cards have been banned for gambling in Great Britain since 14 April 2020 under LCCP condition 6.1.2, including credit-card-funded payments through an e-wallet, and a cashier that refuses credit cards is doing what the licence requires. Bitcoin is not on the standard cashier at any of the seven licensed brands in this comparison; a punter who wants to use BTC is looking outside the licensed market.

Content created by the «Bookies Trust» team